Erotyka — strony, Obrazki i wiele więcej na WordPress
CRT TVs: Not dead yet Erica Ogg CNET News.com Though manufacturers and retailers have sounded a death knell for cathode ray tube TVs, those trusty old boxes are still holding on for dear life.
At the end of 2006, CRTs accounted for 46 per cent of all televisions shipped to North American retailers, according to iSuppli, but you wouldn't know that based on the flood of advertisements and news stories proclaiming the demise of the old tube TV in favour of flashier flat-panel televisions like liquid crystal displays and plasma screens. Despite a decline, CRTs still make up a big chunk of the market, mostly because of their attractive prices, which in many categories are much lower than flat panels.
Of course, LCD televisions have made huge market inroads, especially in North America. While still pricier than CRTs at most screen sizes, $14bn of the $30bn spent on TVs in the North American market last year was on LCDs, a little under half of total market revenue.
But despite the sex appeal of today's increasingly sleek sets, CRTs are still finding success in some unexpected situations. For example, major sporting events are supposed to be the killer app for big-screen, high-definition TVs, but CRTs sold surprisingly well before this year's Super Bowl, according to figures released on Tuesday by The NPD Group.
Nonetheless, though tube TVs make up just under half of the TV volume right now, that number is dropping fast. Just four years ago, they comprised 88 per cent of the market. In 2004, that number dropped to 75 per cent, then 64 per cent in 2005.
The Consumer Electronics Association is predicting that by 2009, CRTs will no longer be sold in the US. But until then, there are still plenty of CRT models to choose from, and it seems the average television buyer is still game for a tube TV at a good bargain.
The main reason CRTs are still selling is that the prices in many popular sizes are still really competitive with LCDs, said Riddhi Patel, an analyst with iSuppli.
In 2006, the average selling price for 30- to 39-inch CRT TVs was $602 (£306), while LCDs in that same range averaged around $1,235 (£629). "It's still double," Patel noted. "In 2007, we're predicting in that 30- to 39-inch range, the average price of CRTs would be $411 (£209), and LCDs would be $780 (£397). The price difference is coming down."
Even Samsung, currently the world's largest LCD TV manufacturer, says it still produces one CRT for every eight TVs shipped. And the Korean electronics giant is still putting money into improving the technology in its tube TVs, like reducing the depth of the TV and improving the circuitry, said Ali Atash, Samsung's senior product manager.
At the Consumer Electronics Show this year, Samsung rolled out five new CRT models that, if glanced just briefly, appeared to be flat-panel displays. That's because of the very thin form factor, flat glass and side-mounted speakers.
And it's not a market Samsung plans to abandon anytime soon. "From our perspective, it's very strategic," Atash said. "We've been very confident in the prospects for 2007."
Sometimes retail customers can still be surprised at how expensive LCDs and plasma displays continue to be. "Many of our customers do come in looking for flat-panel TVs, but when they look at the pricing, a CRT is very, very much more affordable," said Antony Varghese, a Magnolia Home Theater salesman at Best Buy in San Francisco.
As if to prove his point, San Francisco resident Shay Jackson came into the store moments later, clutching one of the shop's promotional flyers. She was looking for a specific TV she had spotted, and said she was disappointed to discover that the $400 (£204) set she had her eye on was a CRT.
"It doesn't look too fancy. I thought it would be a flatscreen," she said. But she added, since she wasn't willing to spend more than $400, and since it was just for her bedroom, she'd be fine "taking it down a notch" and buying a CRT.
Varghese said 32 inches is the most popular size CRT sold at his store, particularly for secondary sets. "Some of our customers come in and buy smaller TVs that have DVDs built in, VCRs built in -- they just want to put them in their garage."
LG introduced one new CRT model last year for the North American market. Sony introduced a line of CRTs last year that it will continue to sell "for the foreseeable future", but it isn't planning on any updates to the technology, said a company spokesperson.
Though Sony isn't rolling out new models stateside, Sony India is pushing a technology called Sparkling Wega, which it claims will better hold contrast and brightness.
There's a reason for that. At 71 per cent of the total market, CRTs are still ruling the global TV market, specifically China, Asia Pacific, the Middle East and Africa, where they have a stronger hold, said iSuppli's Patel.
"In markets like North America and Europe -- because of increased spending power and consumers ready to move to the next set, new technology -- consumers are willing to spend a couple of hundred dollars more. But if you look at emerging countries, even $50 more becomes a lot of money. In those markets flexibility of spending is not as high as it would be in some of the mature markets," she said.
But why, in the US, did CRTs sell so well leading up to the day of the Super Bowl? Because LCDs are getting less expensive, but still can't beat the price of a 30- or 32-inch CRT, said Ross Rubin, director of industry analysis for NPD.
Standard CRT TVs experienced the most growth of all types of TVs the week prior to the Super Bowl this year, according to the data released this week by NPD. Unit sales of CRTs grew by more than 60 per cent, while revenues increased by 46 per cent. Super Bowl week can be an opportunity for retailers to lower prices to push inventory left over from the Christmas sales season.
"Clearly there's a segment of the market that, if you look at the average selling price, LCD has not yet been able to capture a large enough screen size, so direct view is going to be a factor for the next several years," he said. CRTs will also continue to be attractive for the significant number of consumers who have not yet made the jump to high definition, Rubin said.
Meanwhile, the technicians behind some of today's most cutting-edge film effects are loath to switch from CRTs to flat-panel monitors because manufacturers haven't been able to accurately reproduce the colour and contrast on flat panels.
"We need to have consistent colour across all the monitors in the company," he told CNET.co.uk's sister site News.com in a video interview. "We've been using these Sony Artisan CRTs for a bunch of years because they can be calibrated and they have a really good black richness and a nice dynamic range, but they're not manufactured anymore. Almost nobody's making CRTs anymore, and we're definitely having supply problems."
Knoll said it was "inevitable" that ILM would have to make the move to flat panels, of which he's still not convinced yet. "We're getting the first batch in to see how they really work in production... It's not exactly the calibration as much as the dynamic range of the monitor, how good the blacks are, and all of that."
No tak... w Stanach maj± wybór, a w Europie lipa, nie mówi±c ju¿ o Polsce, gdzie z CRT nie ma prawie ju¿ nic...